Talk:IS:track: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Semantic of {{Attr|type}} and mapping to national usage? = | == Semantic of {{Attr|type}} and mapping to national usage? == | ||
As to comply with [[Dev:Wiki_Documentation_Guidelines#Discussion_Pages|our guidelines]] (the wiki discussion pages should be preserved to wiki issues), we moved the debate on principles that developed here to the forum [http://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=521&start=0& to '''this''' place]. | As to comply with [[Dev:Wiki_Documentation_Guidelines#Discussion_Pages|our guidelines]] (the wiki discussion pages should be preserved to wiki issues), we moved the debate on principles that developed here to the forum [http://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=521&start=0& to '''this''' place]. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Yours, [[User:Ferri Leberl|Ferri Leberl]] ([[User talk:Ferri Leberl|talk]]) 16:23, 6 June 2017 (CEST) | Yours, [[User:Ferri Leberl|Ferri Leberl]] ([[User talk:Ferri Leberl|talk]]) 16:23, 6 June 2017 (CEST) | ||
==Summary of the national usage of {{Attr|type}}== | |||
This Table sumarizes the usage of {{Attr|type}} in different companies, as stated [http://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=521 here]. It is planned to transfer it to the best practice section of {{IS:Tag|track}} as soon as it is completed. | |||
{|class=wikitable style="vertical-align:top,textalign:right" | |||
!Company | |||
!Country | |||
!MainTrack | |||
!SecondaryTrack | |||
!ConnectingTrack | |||
!SidingTrack | |||
!StationTrack | |||
!Other:Anything | |||
|- | |||
|Jernbaneverket<br>''within stations''<br>''“on path”'' | |||
|NO<br> <br><br> | |||
|<br>hovedtogspor<br>hovedspor | |||
|<br>øvrige<br>n.u. | |||
|<br>øvrige<br>forbindelsesspor<sup>1</sup> | |||
|<br>n.u.<br>sidespor | |||
|<br>togspor<br>n.u. | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|iRFP | |||
|DE | |||
|Durchgehendes Hauptgleis | |||
|Nebengleis | |||
|Gleisverbindung | |||
|nicht-durchgehendes Hauptgleis | |||
|n.u. | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|colspan=8|<sup>1</sup>informally | |||
|} | |||
Revision as of 16:51, 11 June 2017
Semantic of type and mapping to national usage?
As to comply with our guidelines (the wiki discussion pages should be preserved to wiki issues), we moved the debate on principles that developed here to the forum to this place.
You can backtrace the discussion via the page history.
Thank you for your understanding.
Yours, Ferri Leberl (talk) 16:23, 6 June 2017 (CEST)
Summary of the national usage of type
This Table sumarizes the usage of type in different companies, as stated here. It is planned to transfer it to the best practice section of <track> as soon as it is completed.
| Company | Country | MainTrack | SecondaryTrack | ConnectingTrack | SidingTrack | StationTrack | Other:Anything |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jernbaneverket within stations “on path” |
NO |
hovedtogspor hovedspor |
øvrige n.u. |
øvrige forbindelsesspor1 |
n.u. sidespor |
togspor n.u. |
|
| iRFP | DE | Durchgehendes Hauptgleis | Nebengleis | Gleisverbindung | nicht-durchgehendes Hauptgleis | n.u. | |
| 1informally | |||||||