Talk:IS:track: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Summary of the national usage of {{Attr|type}}: Columns resorted; Info added) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
This Table sumarizes the usage of {{Attr|type}} in different companies, as stated [http://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=521 here]. It is planned to transfer it to the best practice section of {{IS:Tag|track}} as soon as it is completed. | This Table sumarizes the usage of {{Attr|type}} in different companies, as stated [http://www.railml.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=521 here]. It is planned to transfer it to the best practice section of {{IS:Tag|track}} as soon as it is completed. | ||
{|class=wikitable style="vertical-align:top,textalign:right" | {|class=wikitable style="vertical-align:top,textalign:right" | ||
!Country | !Country | ||
!MainTrack | !MainTrack | ||
| Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
!StationTrack | !StationTrack | ||
!Other:Anything | !Other:Anything | ||
!Reported by | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Norway | ||
|<br>hovedtogspor<br>hovedspor | |<br>hovedtogspor<br>hovedspor | ||
|<br>øvrige<br> | |<br>øvrige<br>''not used'' | ||
|<br>øvrige<br>forbindelsesspor<sup>1</sup> | |<br>øvrige<br>forbindelsesspor<sup>1</sup> | ||
|<br> | |<br>''not used''<br>sidespor | ||
|<br>togspor<br> | |<br>togspor<br>''not used'' | ||
| | | | ||
|Jernbaneverket<br>''within stations''<br>''“on path”'' | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Germany | ||
|Durchgehendes Hauptgleis | |Durchgehendes Hauptgleis | ||
|Nebengleis | |Nebengleis | ||
|Gleisverbindung | |Gleisverbindung | ||
|nicht-durchgehendes Hauptgleis | |nicht-durchgehendes Hauptgleis | ||
| | |''not used'' | ||
| | | | ||
|railML.org/iRFP | |||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan=8|<sup>1</sup>informally | |colspan=8|<sup>1</sup>informally | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 22:31, 11 June 2017
Semantic of type and mapping to national usage?
As to comply with our guidelines (the wiki discussion pages should be preserved to wiki issues), we moved the debate on principles that developed here to the forum to this place.
You can backtrace the discussion via the page history.
Thank you for your understanding.
Yours, Ferri Leberl (talk) 16:23, 6 June 2017 (CEST)
Summary of the national usage of type
This Table sumarizes the usage of type in different companies, as stated here. It is planned to transfer it to the best practice section of <track> as soon as it is completed.
| Country | MainTrack | SecondaryTrack | ConnectingTrack | SidingTrack | StationTrack | Other:Anything | Reported by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norway | hovedtogspor hovedspor |
øvrige not used |
øvrige forbindelsesspor1 |
not used sidespor |
togspor not used |
Jernbaneverket within stations “on path” | |
| Germany | Durchgehendes Hauptgleis | Nebengleis | Gleisverbindung | nicht-durchgehendes Hauptgleis | not used | railML.org/iRFP | |
| 1informally | |||||||