Talk:IS:track: Difference between revisions

From railML 2 Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Summary of the national usage of {{Attr|type}}: Swiss content from Alexander Schmidt (SBB Infra Berne) added)
Line 36: Line 36:
|
|
|railML.org/iRFP
|railML.org/iRFP
|-
|Switzerland
|DE: Hauptgleis<br>''Signalisiertes Gleis''<br>FR: Voie signalée<br>IT: Binario segnalato
|''not used''
|''not used''
|Nebengleis<br>''Nicht-signalisiertes Gleis''<br>FR: Voie non-signalée<br>IT: Binario non segnalato
|''not used''
|
|SBB Infra<br>Quelle: SBB-Vorschrift I-22211
|-
|-
|colspan=8|<sup>1</sup>informally
|colspan=8|<sup>1</sup>informally
|}
|}

Revision as of 13:50, 21 August 2017

Semantic of type and mapping to national usage?

As to comply with our guidelines (the wiki discussion pages should be preserved to wiki issues), we moved the debate on principles that developed here to the forum to this place.

You can backtrace the discussion via the page history.

Thank you for your understanding.

Yours, Ferri Leberl (talk) 16:23, 6 June 2017 (CEST)

Summary of the national usage of type

This Table sumarizes the usage of type in different companies, as stated here. It is planned to transfer it to the best practice section of <track> as soon as it is completed. This place is intended for collection only, please put any remarks to the railML's discussion board.

Country MainTrack SecondaryTrack ConnectingTrack SidingTrack StationTrack Other:Anything Reported by
Norway
hovedtogspor
hovedspor

øvrige
not used

øvrige
forbindelsesspor1

not used
sidespor

togspor
not used
Jernbaneverket
within stations
“on path”
Germany Durchgehendes Hauptgleis nicht-durchgehendes Hauptgleis Gleisverbindung Nebengleis not used railML.org/iRFP
Switzerland DE: Hauptgleis
Signalisiertes Gleis
FR: Voie signalée
IT: Binario segnalato
not used not used Nebengleis
Nicht-signalisiertes Gleis
FR: Voie non-signalée
IT: Binario non segnalato
not used SBB Infra
Quelle: SBB-Vorschrift I-22211
1informally